Drawing for CLOUD OF OPPORTUNITY

USPTO serial 85372501

CLOUD OF OPPORTUNITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUD OF OPPORTUNITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles G. Zug

CHARLES G. ZUG NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP100 N TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services in the field of cloud technology; Business Process as a Service (BPaaS) services, namely, business process outsourcing services, in the field of automation and standardization of business processesACTIVE—
039Storage of electronic dataACTIVE—
042Computer infrastructure hosting services, namely, infrastructure as a service (IaaS), namely, providing computer hardware and computer software to others on a subscription or pay-per-use basis; IT consulting services; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, cloud technology, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Monitoring of computer systems and networks for purposes of tracking hardware and software resource availability; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for creating new software applications for use in cloud environments; Software as a service (SaaS) consulting services; Hosting of websites and software applications for others; Providing transparency monitoring as a service using online, non-downloadable software; Software conversion services, namely, converting pre-existing software applications for use in cloud environments; Cloud computing featuring software for moving virtual machines from customer premise to off premise infrastructure as a service; Computer software design as a service; Computer application development services; Implementation and updating of software as a service; Integration of computer systems and networks; Computer software testing as a service; Computer file and data protection services, namely, replication, failover, failure recovery and disaster recovery for others; Managed computer services, namely, managed firewalls, managed backups, and security scans in the nature of computer virus protection services; Data backup and data restoration service; Computer services, namely, remote management of computer operating systems, databases, and software applicationsACTIVE—
045Monitoring of computer systems and networks for security purposes; Consulting in the field of Internet, network, and computer system securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance