USPTO serial 85374837
TECHAGE DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHAGE DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Animation design for others; Architectural design; Architectural design in the field of interior design; Computer aided design for others; Computer aided graphic design; Consulting in the field of interior design; Consulting services in the field of architectural design; Consulting services in the field of feng shui design; Creating and designing web pages for others; Creating, designing and maintaining web sites; Design and styling of miniature rooms for display purposes; Design for others in the field of interior design; Design of interior decor; Design of models, sets and props for motion pictures, videos, commercials and movie trailers; Design of specialty interior and exterior environment settings; Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of interior design; Designing web pages for others; Designing websites for others; Designing interior design; Furniture design services; Graphic art design; Graphic design services for interior design; Graphic illustration and drawing services, namely, providing graphic illustrations and drawings of commercial and industrial building designs, and converting building designs or markups to electronic CAD drawings; Interior decorating; Interior decoration consultation; Interior design services; Interior design services including space planning, furniture selection, material and surface selection; Lighting design and technology specification services pertaining to permanent or temporary architectural, theatrical, entertainment, commercial and/or residential applications; Paint matching, namely, color analysis to determine proper paint mixture for matching colors for interior decorating purposes; Planning and design of interior design; Providing a website featuring information about green architecture, interior design, sustainable community planning and infrastructure development; Providing a website featuring information in the field of interior design and architecture for use by interior designers and architects; Providing design services for others in the field of theme parks, museums, and miniature golf courses; Room design consisting of selection of artwork, lighting, and furnishings for an environment designed to help achieve mental wellness, including stress management and relaxation, using computer controlled advanced sound wave technology; Set design for theatrical enterprises; Shop interior design; Visual design services in the nature of designing visual elements for on-line, broadcast, print, outdoor and other communication media; Website design and development for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |