USPTO serial 85376254
VIPER POWER SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER POWER SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Southington, CT
Southington, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Twilley
RICHARD J TWILLEY MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM ST FL 18HARTFORD, CT 06103-3410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric DC/AC power conversion equipment, namely, electric DC/AC power converters; electric power converters; electronic controllers for use in determining at least one of a plurality of power sources for use in a system; power adapters; power controllers; DC/AC power converters and renewable energy systems comprised of rechargeable electric batteries | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |