USPTO serial 85376722
HANGER MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANGER MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent A. Fischmann
KENT A. FISCHMANN MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP8055 E TUFFS AVE # 450DENVER, CO 80237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Staple foods in the nature of processed cereals; canned, dried, frozen and preserved fruits and vegetables; baked goods, namely muffins, cookies, cakes, cupcakes, doughnuts, pies, tarts, quiches and sandwiches; and preparations made from cereals, namely, granola and breakfast cereal chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars. Restaurant prepared foods, in the nature of combination meals consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entree and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premises. Processed foods, in the nature of fruits, processed vegetables, processed meats and processed seafood. Snack foods in the nature of cereal-based snack food, corn-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods, granola snacks, rice-based snack food; and fruit-based snack foods, meat-based snack foods, potato-based snack foods, soy-based snack foods, tofu-based snack foods, and vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services for fast food and quick casual restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |