USPTO serial 85377021
ELECTRONIC TRAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTRONIC TRAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell D. Orkin, Registration No. 25,363
RUSSELL D. ORKIN THE WEBB LAW FIRM420 FORT DUQUESNE BLVD STE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and hardware for controlling trains, namely an on-board computer and display and software with a communication interface for monitoring and reporting train location, onboard fuel data and event recording, interaction with locomotive crew for alertness assurance and performance, railcar and locomotive rear end link status, train pacing, basic and advanced reactive enforcement, authority monitoring and work zone safety alerts, database processing, control and display of data communication from wayside interface equipment, moving maps identifying location of locomotive and railcars, automatic locomotive horn sequencer, automatic video surveillance and signal overlay, and processing and communication of critical safety data for automatic authority generation, dynamic moving block data and railroad crossing activation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |