Drawing for SCANSEE

USPTO serial 85377319

SCANSEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCANSEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory W. Carr

GREGORY W. CARR CARR LLPSTE 1116170 Research Rd.Frisco, TX 75033

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promotional advertising and marketing management for celebrities; providing an interactive web site for users to review and rate internet content, people, companies, products and/or services utilizing a software application to award points whereby web site users are eligible to exchange points earned for promotional items consisting of coupons, rebates, discounts or special offerings on goods and/or service provided by web site sponsors; franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance