USPTO serial 85377791
HYDROGEN 2.0
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDROGEN 2.0?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary S. Mathew
Mary S. Mathew Dentons US LLPP.O. BOX #061080Wacker Drive Station, Willis TowerCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals, namely, additives for treating water molecules for generation of hydrogen gas | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Hydrogen fueling station pumps, gas compressors, hydrogen feedstock fluid mixers, hydrogen-powered generators and turbines, and auxiliary power units | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hydrogen gas-generation equipment and components, namely, hydrogen gas generators, hydrogen gas purifiers and apparatus, namely, hydrogen gas dispensers, hydrogen gas storage vessels, hydrogen burners and associated boilers and hydrogen safety equipment for handling and concentrating of hydrogen gas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOLECULAR POWER SYSTEMS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MOLECULAR POWER SYSTEMS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named HYDROGEN 2.0
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |