CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for APOCALYPSE

USPTO serial 85378227

APOCALYPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APOCALYPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

CHARLES P. LAPOLLA OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ornamental magnets and refrigerator magnetsACTIVE—
014pins being jewelry; bracelets; bracelets of rubberACTIVE—
016stationery, pencils, jumbo pencils, pensACTIVE—
020picture frames; keychains made of non-metal and non-leatherACTIVE—
028snow globesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 14, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance