Drawing for BARISTA

USPTO serial 85378436

BARISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Principe

David L. Principe Phillips Lytle LLP3400 HSBC CenterBuffalo, NY 14203-2887UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising for publishers, advertisers and marketers via an on-line high-speed communications network on the InternetACTIVE—
038Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of advertising programs and media advertising communications for publishers, advertisers and marketers via high-speed InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 26, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 19, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance