USPTO serial 85378444
EIGR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EIGR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee Taylor
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fiber optic cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical and surgical instruments and apparatus featuring illumination, visualization, and photonic technology, namely, electrosurgical instruments and apparatus, optical imaging instruments and apparatus, spectroscopic instruments and apparatus, fluorescence instruments and apparatus in the nature of optical probes and light engines, 3D and stereoscopic instruments and apparatus in the nature of optical probes and imaging apparatus, pneumatic apparatus in the nature of mechanical arms for surgical instrument support, neuromonitor instruments and apparatus, navigation devices in the nature of optical tracking apparatus and electromagnetic tracking apparatus, intraoral instruments, optical probes, fiber optic probes, LED and laser light engines, spectrum selective light sources, surgical retractors, cannulas, scalpels, pins, fiber optical waveguides, polymer optical waveguides, suction devices in the nature of surgical irrigation and aspiration devices, medical endoscopes and video equipment in the nature of endoscopy cameras and endo-illumination systems for surgical use, laparoscopic instruments, lasers for medical use, fiber optic instruments for diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical use in the nature of an optical waveguide integrated into a fiber optic cable, dental instruments for use in intra-oral procedures and oral surgery, and light sources imaging equipment in the nature of surgical light sources, illumination devices, endo-illuminators, ophthalmic chandeliers, surgical instruments and apparatus; all of the foregoing for use in providing illumination and visualization for medical diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedures in the fields of cranial, spinal, breast, thyroid, head, neck, sinus, epidural, laparoscopic, general, neuro, biopsy, orthopedic, gastrointestinal, ophthalmologic, endocrine, cardiac, colorectal, gynecological and thoracic surgery; Illuminated surgical instruments, namely, electrosurgical instruments and apparatus, optical imaging instruments and apparatus, spectroscopic instruments and apparatus, fluorescence instruments and apparatus in the nature of optical probes and light engines, 3D and stereoscopic instruments and apparatus in the nature of optical probes and imaging apparatus, pneumatic apparatus in the nature of mechanical arms for surgical instrument support, neuromonitor instruments and apparatus, navigation devices in the nature of optical tracking apparatus and electromagnetic tracking apparatus, intraoral instruments, optical probes, fiber optic probes, LED and laser light engines, spectrum selective light sources, surgical retractors, cannulas, scalpels, pins, fiber optical waveguides, polymer optical waveguides, suction devices in the nature of surgical irrigation and aspiration devices, medical endoscopes and video equipment in the nature of endoscopy cameras and endo-illumination systems for surgical use, laparoscopic instruments, lasers for medical use, fiber optic instruments for diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical use in the nature of an optical waveguide integrated into a fiber optic cable, dental instruments for use in intra-oral procedures and oral surgery, and light sources imaging equipment in the nature of surgical light sources, illumination devices, endo-illuminators, ophthalmic chandeliers, surgical instruments and apparatus; all of the foregoing for use in providing illumination and visualization for medical diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedures in the fields of cranial, spinal, breast, thyroid, head, neck, sinus, epidural, laparoscopic, general, neuro, biopsy, orthopedic, gastrointestinal, ophthalmologic, endocrine, cardiac, colorectal, gynecological and thoracic surgery; Illuminated surgical instruments, namely, handheld surgical instruments powered by electrosurgical, electronic, laser, ultrasonic, microwave, optical, and radio frequency generators for neuromonitoring, ablating, incising, resecting, coagulating, vaporizing and aspirating tissue during surgical procedures; medical devices employing visualization, illumination, and photonic technology for diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedures, namely, illuminated surgical retractors, illuminated cannulas, illuminated scalpels, illuminated pins, fiber optical waveguides, polymer optical waveguides, illuminated suction devices in the nature of surgical irrigation and aspiration devices; Illuminated medical endoscopes and video equipment in the nature of endoscopy cameras, endo-illumination systems for surgical use, illuminated laparoscopic instruments, lasers for medical use, fiber optics instruments for diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical use in the nature of an optical waveguide integrated into a fiber optic cable, illuminated dental instruments for use in intra-oral procedures and oral surgery, and light sources imaging equipment in the nature of surgical light sources, illumination devices, endo-illuminators, ophthalmic chandeliers, surgical instruments and apparatus; Medical devices employing visualization, illumination, and photonic technology for diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical procedures, namely, illuminated surgical instruments powered by electrosurgical, electronic, laser, ultrasonic, microwave, optical, and radio frequency generators for neuromonitoring, ablating, incising, resecting, coagulating, vaporizing and aspirating tissue during surgical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |