USPTO serial 85378694
TOTAL CAR SCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTAL CAR SCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer H. Hamilton
JENNIFER H. HAMILTON THE ECLIPSE GROUP LLP6345 BALBOA BLVD STE 325ENCINO, CA 91316-1580UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ON-LINE DATABASE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF USED AND NEW MODEL MOTOR VEHICLES AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY OTHERS, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCHABLE INFORMATION ON VARIOUS VEHICLE MAKES AND MODELS TO ASSIST BUYERS AND SELLERS OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND PROVIDING CONSUMERS WITH OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING VEHICLE PERFORMANCE, PROVIDING OVERALL VEHICLE RANKINGS AND AGGREGATED SCORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION DERIVED BY THIRD PARTY REPORTING AGENCIES AND COMPANIES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT VEHICLES FOR SALE OVER THE INTERNET; MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, COLLECTING AND PROVIDING ANALYTICAL INFORMATION TO BUSINESSES AND CONSUMERS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLES, INCLUDING, CONSUMER BUYING HABITS, CONSUMER PREFERENCES, VEHICLE PERFORMANCE, VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS, VEHICLE RANKINGS, VEHICLE SAFETY AND OTHER ANALYTICAL DATA RELATED TO CONSUMER PURCHASING AND SEARCHING HABITS; AND ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING NON-DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY ARTICLES AND PRODUCT SPECIFICATION, PRODUCT DESCRIPTION AND PRODUCT EVALUATION REPORTS ON THE SUBJECT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, MOTOR VEHICLES SALES, MOTOR VEHICLES PERFORMANCE, MOTOR VEHICLE TESTING, MOTOR VEHICLE RANKINGS, MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLE AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Total Car Score, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Total Car Score, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TOTAL CAR SCORE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |