USPTO serial 85380009
WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT WTF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT WTF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moreland Hills, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita E. Kline
RITA E KLINE TAROLLI SUNDHEIM COVELL & TUMMINO LLP1300 E 9TH ST STE 1700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and accessories, namely, anorak; anoraks parkas; athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps; athletic uniforms; bandanas; baseball caps; baseball caps and hats; bathing costumes; bathing costumes for women; bathing suits; bathing suits for men; bathing trunks; bathrobes; beach coverups; beach cover-ups; belts clothing; belts made out of cloth; belts of textile; bow ties; boxer briefs, boxer shorts; briefs; briefs underwear; button down shirts; caps headwear; caps with visors; collared shirts; do rags; dress shirts; earbands; fabric belts; fleece pullovers; fleece tops; fleece vests; garter belts; garters; golf caps; golf pants, shirts and skirts; golf shirts; G-strings; halter tops; hats; head scarves; head sweatbands; head wear; headbands; headbands against sweating; headbands for clothing; headgear, namely, hats, caps; headwear; hooded pullovers; hooded sweat shirts; hooded sweatshirts; jackets; jackets and socks; jogging outfits; jogging pants; jogging suits; mittens; neckerchiefs; neckerchieves; neckties; neckwear; open-necked shirts; outdoor gloves; outdoor mittens; pajama bottoms; pajamas; panties; panties, shorts and briefs; parkas; polo shirts; pullovers; robes; running suits; scarfs; scarves; shell jackets; shirts; shirts and short-sleeved shirts; short-sleeved or long sleeved t-shirts; short-sleeved shirts; sleep pants; sleep shirts; sleeping garments; sleepwear; suspender belts; suspender belts for men; suspender belts for women; suspenders; suspenders braces; swim suits; swim trunks; swim wear; swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; swimming costumes; swimming trunks; swimsuits; swimwear; tank tops; tankinis; tank-tops; tee shirts; trunks; tube tops; tuxedo belts; T-shirts; under garments; underclothes; undergarments; underpants; undershirts; underskirts; underwear; visors; wind resistant jackets; wind vests; windcheaters; windjammers; windshirts; wind-jackets; wrist bands; wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |