USPTO serial 85381157
CLOUD SURVEILLANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUD SURVEILLANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Neil Sudol
R NEIL SUDOL COLEMAN SUDOL SAPONE PC714 COLORADO AVEBRIDGEPORT, CT 06605-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radar; sensors, namely, radar sensors consisting of various combinations of radar transceivers, antennas, radar-activated deterrent devices, namely, audio speakers and lasers for non-medical purposes, automatic identification electronic sensors, proximity sensors, and optical sensors, all the aforesaid sold as a unit for the purpose of determining the position, dynamics and behavior of targets, namely, vessels, aircraft, birds, bats, vehicles or persons; data and signal processors, namely, digital signal processors, including target fusion data processors and automatic scene understanding data processors for the purpose of characterizing target behavior; radar detectors for the purpose of detecting targets, namely, vessels, aircraft, birds, bats, vehicles or persons; trackers, namely, target trackers for generating radar tracks and extracting data on targets, namely, vessels, aircraft, birds, bats, vehicles or persons; target information systems consisting of a combination of data processors, computer servers and target data storage and management devices in the nature of RAID-based hard drive backup systems, computer software for databasing and computer servers, all the aforesaid for providing information about radar targets; monitoring systems in the nature of computer hardware to provide operators with situational awareness on targets of interest including real-time location information, historical target behavior information, and intrusion alarms for use in the maritime domain, border security, port security, coastal security, critical infrastructure protection, search and rescue, sense and avoid for air traffic control of unmanned aerial systems, bird strike prevention with aircraft, and deterring birds away from agricultural, mining and energy sites; and radar networks consisting of combinations of radar, the aforesaid radar sensors, the aforesaid data and signal processors, the aforesaid radar detectors, the aforesaid trackers, the aforesaid target information systems, the aforesaid monitoring systems and computer networking hardware formed by various combinations of local and wide area network hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of target activity, namely, the locations, movements and behavior of vessels, aircraft, birds, bats, vehicles or persons and user-defined alarms in the nature of alarm response and verification services; providing the aforesaid target activity information in the field of homeland safety and security issues to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies; services in the nature of tracking vessels, aircraft, vehicles and birds for safety and security purposes to ensure compliance with laws or for the protection of people, animals or property; providing traffic pattern information on vessels, aircraft, vehicles and birds for safety and security purposes to ensure compliance with laws or for the protection of people, animals or property; bird strike prevention services in the nature of providing information to characterize habitat utilization by birds in the vicinity of aircraft through tracking, locating and monitoring services and providing alerts of hazardous bird activity to operators; automatic bird deterrent services in the nature of detecting the presence of hazardous bird activity using radar and triggering deterrent devices, namely, audio speakers and lasers for non-medical purposes, to repel the birds; security services, namely, monitoring of security systems in the nature of perimeters, zones, and facilities for intrusions and alerting operators; law enforcement services, namely, analyzing the aforesaid target data in computer databases for criminal activity; border enforcement services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on target activity in guarding for border activities; critical infrastructure protection services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on target activity in guarding for facilities; port security services, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on target activity in guarding for ports; search and rescue services, namely, providing target activity information in support of search and rescue operations; waterside security, namely, monitoring and electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on target activity in guarding maritime facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |