Drawing for TREKSHOPS

USPTO serial 85381367

TREKSHOPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREKSHOPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Anthony Merchant, Ph.D.

Mary Anthony Merchant, Ph.D. Ballard Spahr LLP999 Peachtree StreetSuite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020bathroom furniture; bedroom furniture; custom bedroom furniture; entertainment centers; fitted fabric furniture covers; fitted fabric slipcovers for furniture; bedroom furniture chests; furniture frames; furniture made from steel tubing; furniture moldings; furniture primarily of metal, namely, mirrors, bed frames, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, dog gates, and baby gates; mirrors, picture frames; furniture, namely, dressers; furniture, namely, poufs; furniture, namely, wardrobes; futons; kitchen furniture, namely, ready to assemble mobile kitchen islands; laminated vinyl to be affixed to the surface of furniture; lawn furniture; living room furniture; patio furniture; pet furniture; plastic furniture for gardens; recliners; screens; television stands; toy boxes; upholstered bedroom furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance