Drawing for ICOLLECTION

USPTO serial 85383568

ICOLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICOLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church St.22nd Fl.Hartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Pillows and mattress padsACTIVE—
024Mattress padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance