USPTO serial 85383801
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising by transmission of on-line publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; Advertising, marketing and promotional services related to all industries for the purpose of facilitating networking and socializing opportunities for business purposes; Business networking; General business networking referral services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by passing business leads and referrals among group members; On-line advertising on computer networks; On-line business networking services; Promoting the goods and services of others via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |