USPTO serial 85383839
MIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith L. Grubner
JUDITH L. GRUBNER ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-3910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Chairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |