USPTO serial 85384421
MEDRAD RADIOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDRAD RADIOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Inidanola, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Schramm
DAVID SCHRAMM MEDRAD, INC.1 MEDRAD DRINDIANOLA, PA 15051-9759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES FOR USE IN DIAGNOSTIC, OR THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES, WOUND MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, AND MEDICAL FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEMS, NAMELY, INJECTORS, CATHETERS, SYRINGES, AND DISPOSABLE FLUID PATH TUBING SETS TO BE CONNECTED TO AND USED WITH INJECTORS, CATHETERS AND SYRINGES; PATIENT MONITORING DEVICES FOR USE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING APPARATUS; ANATOMICAL CONFORMABLE SURFACE COILS AND PROBES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; AUTOMATIC TUNING DEVICES AND ANATOMICAL POSITIONING DEVICES FOR USE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |