Drawing for EXIDE VORTEX

USPTO serial 85387989

EXIDE VORTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXIDE VORTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger P. Furey

Roger P. Furey Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP2900 K Street, N.W.North Tower, Suite 200Washington, DC 20007-5118

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electric storage batteriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2012EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance