Drawing for VIRASURE

USPTO serial 85389201

VIRASURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRASURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. DuRoss

LISA M. DUROSS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.PO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Veterinary preparations for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases and infections in farmed fish and livestock; all purpose disinfectants; disinfectants for water used in acquaculture and livestock production; disinfectants for apparatus used in acquaculture and livestock production; preparations for destroying vermin; pesticides; biocidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 8, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 8, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance