Drawing for ACE TEMPEST LIFE RE

USPTO serial 85389569

ACE TEMPEST LIFE RE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARANT, LUCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACE TEMPEST LIFE RE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

Timothy D. Pecsenye Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance services, namely, reinsurance underwriting services; insurance services, namely, life reinsurance risk and capital management services in the field of fixed and variable annuity productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance