Drawing for FULL CIRCLE

USPTO serial 85389725

FULL CIRCLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL CIRCLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

ALLISON R IMBER ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRIST PA255 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUEPOST OFFICE BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting live campus and online workshops, continuing educational programs, blogs, and seminars by alumni in the areas of script and music development, composing and recording, new media content creation, production and post-production services in the fields of video games, music, video, web, graphic design and multimedia entertainment software, all of the foregoing services offered solely by alumniACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 30, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 20, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 16, 2012OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance