USPTO serial 85390310
GLEBAR COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLEBAR COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Franklin Lakes, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrifugal grinding machines; Components for machines and machine tools, grinding machines, material handling machines, food processing machines, chemistry processing machines and textile industry machines, namely, sand, chemical and reverse osmosis filters; Grinding and polishing machines; Grinding machines; Grinding machines for the treatment of ceramics and metal; Grinding machines for Medical Device Equipment Designed for Medical Device precision grinding and gauging, Glass material production grinding, Metal working, Ceramic material forming and finishing; Composite material precision forming and finishing; Rubber material precision forming and finishing; Wood precision form grinding; Plastic materials precision grinding and finishing machines; Grinding machines with spiral bevel gears; Grinding tools for grinding machines; Internal grinding machines; Involute grinding machines; Polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramics and plastics; Polishing system for use in single-head machines comprising grinding and polishing discs for stone profiling and edges; Power-operated grinding wheels; Power-operated grinding wheels for optical lens grinding; Wood grinding machines | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1958 |
| 040 | Applying finishes to metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical devices; Custom building of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working; Custom fabrication and production of metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical devices; Custom manufacture of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working; Grinding; Manufacture of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working to order and/or specification of others; Manufacturing services for others in the field of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working; Metal fabrication and finishing services | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 1, 1958 |
| 042 | Engineering services in the field of development of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the development of tools and components for metal, ceramic, wood, rubber, composite materials, glass and medical device manufacture and working; Product development and engineering services for others; Testing, analysis and evaluation of metal tools, machinery and fabrication equipment; Tool design; Tool management systems design services | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 1, 1958 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |