USPTO serial 85390908
SMART ALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART ALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richardson, TX
Carrollton, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Becker
JEFFREY M. BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVE STE 700DALLAS, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in managing real estate leasing transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 5, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Feb 17, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Aug 7, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| May 26, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| May 12, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 13, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Aug 8, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 8, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 7, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jul 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Jun 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| May 2, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Apr 17, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Apr 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | โ |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |