USPTO serial 85392806
VIRGINCHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRGINCHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing online instruction in the field of culinary arts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |