USPTO serial 85393473
EASY FLUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY FLUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dieppe, New Brunswick, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | bathroom tissue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |