USPTO serial 85393582
Serial No. 85393582
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4834270Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2015
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 85393582?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Peter Spies
R. Peter Spies DTL Ltd.160 North Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Posters; ] Cookbooks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ Cooking forks; non electric cooking pans; cooking pot sets; cooking pots; cooking utensils, namely, grills, grill covers, barbecue branders; cookware for use in microwave ovens; Cookware, namely, pots and pans, roasting pans; High temperature nylon and polyethylene pan liners that help prevent food from sticking to the pan while storing, warming and cooking food; hotdog cooking forks and marshmallow cooking forks; household utensils, namely, graters, spatulas, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, whisks, kitchen tongs; jars for cooking grease sold empty; kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; metal cooking pans; portable cooking kits for outdoor use; rolling pins for cooking purposes; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; wood chopping blocks; wood cooking planks for use in grilling ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | T-shirts; hats; sweatshirts [ ; cooking clothes, namely, aprons and chef hats ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Development and production of television programs; providing a website for entertainment purposes featuring videos and information in the field of cooking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NextTime Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NextTime Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NextTime Productions Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 20, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |