USPTO serial 85399634
MAN GLOW DR. MANDEL BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAN GLOW DR. MANDEL BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa K. Dagodag
MELISSA K. DAGODAG THE LAW OFFICES OF MELISSA K. DAGODAG468 North Camden Drive2nd FloorBeverly Hills, CA 90210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-sun gels; After-sun milks; After-sun oils; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Cosmetics, namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Face creams for cosmetic use; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Greases for cosmetic purposes; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils cosmetics ; Anti-aging creams; Anti-wrinkle creams; After-shave creams;, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, soap, body polish, body cream; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Body cream; Cold cream; Face and body creams; Hair care creams; Hand cream; Moisturizing creams; Night cream; Perfumed creams; Pre-shave creams; Scented body lotions and creams; Skin cream; Wrinkle resistant cream; Cologne; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Eau de cologne; Eau de perfume; Perfume; Perfume oils; Hair conditioner; Hair dressings for men; hair gel; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Creamy foundation; Foundation make-up; Make up foundations; Face and body lotions; Face powder; Loose face powder; Make-up powder; Pressed face powder; Blush; After-shave; After-shave balms; Shaving foam; Shaving gel; Shaving lotion; Shaving preparations; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Skin toners; Facial cleansers; Skin cleansers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucemax of Beverly Hills, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucemax of Beverly Hills, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named MAN GLOW DR. MANDEL BEAUTY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |