Drawing for INTELECT SCADA SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 85399876

INTELECT SCADA SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELECT SCADA SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles A. Armgardt

CHARLES A ARMGARDT MODRALL SPERLING ROEHL HARRIS & SISK PA500 4TH ST NW SUITE 1000POST OFFICE BOX 2168ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87103-2168

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of monitoring and controlling offsite industrial facilities, recording facilities data, and establishing safety and environmental alarm notification and reportingABANDONEDApr 16, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 20, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 20, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 20, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 3, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance