USPTO serial 85400581
PRECISIONFLOW TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4274143Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2013
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRECISIONFLOW TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
Saugerties, NY
Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
Saugerties, NY
Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
Saugerties, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas Mesiti
NICHOLAS MESITI HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial machines for manufacturing semiconductors, light emitting diodes and photovoltaic cells, namely, units for the purpose of chemical delivery, vapor delivery, gas isolation, gas mixing, gas monitoring, gas purging and gas delivery during manufacturing; Industrial machines for manufacturing semiconductors, light emitting diodes and photovoltaic cells, namely, gas cabinets, gas cylinder units, gas panels, and gas dewar delivery units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Flow Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named PRECISIONFLOW TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |