USPTO serial 85400924
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Talivaldis Cepuritis
TALIVALDIS CEPURITIS OLSON & CEPURITIS, LTD.20 N WACKER DR FL 36CHICAGO, IL 60606-3103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ROOM FRAGRANCES, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR AROMATHERAPY USE; PERFUME OILS; INCENSE STICKS; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACIAL CLEANSERS, SOAPS, FACE MASKS, LOTIONS, CREAMS, TONERS, EXFOLIATING CREAMS, EXFOLIATING GELS, SUN TAN LOTIONS, AROMATHERAPY BATH PRODUCTS, MAKE-UP REMOVERS, AND BLEMISH CLARIFYING LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PICTURES; FRAMED ART PICTURES; FRAMED PRINTED ART REPRODUCTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, TOTE BAGS, BACKPACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PICTURE FRAMES; WOOD BOXES, ORNAMENTS OF WOOD; PILLOWS; DECORATIVE CUSHIONS; FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | GLASS JARS; DRINKING GLASSES, VASES; FLORAL POTS; PLANTERS FOR FLOWERS AND PLANTS, NAMELY, PLANTER POTS, GROWER POTS; FLORAL BASKETS; PLANT BASKETS; BASKETS OF WICKER, STRAW, WOOD, AND RATTAN; CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY; BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; CUPS; DISHES; PITCHERS; BOWLS; SERVING PLATTERS; WALL DECORATIONS, NAMELY, FLOWER POTS AND WALL FLOWER PLANTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BLANKETS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS AND THROW BLANKETS; SHOWER CURTAINS; PLACEMATS OF TEXTILE MATERIAL; FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS; TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |