USPTO serial 85401278
IMPROVING HUMAN PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2014
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IMPROVING HUMAN PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly McLean
Kimberly McLean Mclean Law LLC865 E Lombard StBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology services and biomedical engineering services in the field of augmenting human cognitive and psychomotor skills for improving task proficiency and enhancing human learning, health, and performance; research and development services, namely, consulting, research and development of methods, devices and systems for monitoring, diagnosing, discovering, altering, and instructing human learning, health, and performance; medical, scientific, and technical research in the field of human learning, health, and performance; design and development of computer hardware and software used for enhancing human learning, health and performance; research and development services, namely, development of virtual reality eyewear and wearable biometric body monitors; research and development services, namely, development of wearable augmented and virtual reality goggles, and wearable body monitors; information technology and biomedical engineering services; computer modeling and simulation services, namely, computer modeling and simulation of human learning, health, and performance of executable tasks using wearable body monitoring devices and augmented and virtual reality hardware and software systems; information technology services and biomedical engineering services, namely, the development of human performance interfaces to prevent and detect various diseases, illnesses, injuries, and physical threats | ACTIVE | Dec 23, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |