Drawing for CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CJ BANKS LIFE. YOU WEAR IT WELL.

USPTO serial 85401296

CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CJ BANKS LIFE. YOU WEAR IT WELL.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CJ BANKS LIFE. YOU WEAR IT WELL.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean R. Karau

DEAN R. KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE—
018handbagsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, bottoms, jeans, pants, skirts, capris, shorts, knit tops, blouses, shirts, dresses, camisoles, sweaters, jackets, swimwear, vests, hosiery and tights; clothing accessories, namely, scarves, fabric belts, belts made of leatherACTIVE—
035Retail store, mail order, and on-line retail store services featuring women's clothing and apparel, clothing accessories, and jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance