Drawing for ELDORADO CAFÉ D'ORO

USPTO serial 85401417

ELDORADO CAFÉ D'ORO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELDORADO CAFÉ D'ORO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Kadden

RONALD S. KADDEN VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN JANSSEN & GIORDANO60 E 42ND ST STE 2446NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CoffeeACTIVEDec 6, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 28, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 28, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2012RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jul 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance