USPTO serial 85401606
ROTITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROTITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Reena J. Patel
REENA J. PATEL LAW OFFICE OF REENA J. PATELPMB 928 PPP 10000Saipan, MP 96950-8900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bread boards; Carving boards; Cheese board and knife set; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Containers for household or kitchen use; Cruet stands for oil or vinegar not of precious metal; Cutting boards; Fruit bowls; Holder for cutting board; Household utensils, namely, graters; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Household utensils, namely, turners; Kitchen containers; Kitchen utensils, namely, pouring and straining spouts; Knife boards; Ladles, for kitchen use; Mixing bowls; Pastry boards; Pepper pots, sugar bowls and salt shakers; Rinsing bowls; Rolling pins; Salad bowls; Utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; Wood chopping blocks; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |