Drawing for EGGS-SPECIALLY WHAT EVERYONE WANTS

USPTO serial 85402098

EGGS-SPECIALLY WHAT EVERYONE WANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGGS-SPECIALLY WHAT EVERYONE WANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

SCOTT J. MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD FL 14ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030PASTRIES, NAMELY, FROZEN EGG-SHAPED DESSERT ITEMS; PASTRIES, NAMELY, BAKED EGG-SHAPED DESSERT ITEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 25, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 25, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 3, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance