Drawing for POSTSEASON GREEN TEAM

USPTO serial 85402099

POSTSEASON GREEN TEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POSTSEASON GREEN TEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin, Esq.

MARY L KEVLIN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Charitable services, namely, organizing and conducting environmental programs to promote socially responsible and environmental practicesACTIVEOct 10, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 10, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2014AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 23, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 22, 2014EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 26, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 23, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 12, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance