USPTO serial 85402290
YOUR PLANET, YOUR CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOUR PLANET, YOUR CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Koko Environmental Solutions Ltd.
Whitecourt, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill J. Chalmers
JILL J. CHALMERS BRYAN CAVE LLP90 S CASCADE AVE STE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903-1615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Environmentally friendly automatic vending machines for coin-operated apparatus that dispense windshield washer fluid | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing environmentally friendly vending machines for dispensing windshield washer fluid; rental of environmentally friendly vending machines; vending machine services; and promoting public awareness of environmentally friendly products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |