Drawing for INTIMILK

USPTO serial 85402761

INTIMILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTIMILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Parkhurst

TODD S PARKHURST HUGHES SOCOL PIERS RESNICK & DYM LTDTHREE FIRST NATIONAL PLAZA70 W MADISON ST STE 4000CHICAGO, IL 60602-5010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Grain-based beveragesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 30, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 30, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance