USPTO serial 85402859
MCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; design and development of mobile applications, websites, mobile websites, microsites, client interfaces and web-based advertisements; design, development of rich media smartphone, feature phone, handheld computer, and tablet mobile applications; computer software design and development services in the field of mobile and wireless applications; hosting digital content on the Internet; hosting online websites and webpages for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites for delivery of localized, customized and personalized content to handheld computers, mobile electronic devices, electronic entertainment devices, desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, and video game systems; computer services, namely, hosting for others of websites and databases for tracking, monitoring, managing, collecting, analyzing, optimizing and reporting data regarding consumer preferences, behavior and lifestyles; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); software as a service (SAAS) services for the design and development of mobile applications, websites, mobile websites, microsites, user interfaces and web-based advertisements; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for allowing companies to connect to consumers to deliver advertising and marketing content over global computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring merchandising, marketing, interactive marketing, advertising, and content aggregation via a mobile phone, wireless networks and web based environments; software as a service (SAAS) services for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; software as a service (SAAS) services for selling and delivering digital music, videos, and other forms of rich media content; tools for managing the foregoing digital content; applications, widgets, carrier services and hard goods via mobile phone, wireless networks and web-based environments; software as a service (SAAS) services for customer relationship management; software as a service (SAAS) services for use in monetizing online content delivery services and performing electronic business transactions via a global computer network; software as a service (SAAS) services for creating, editing, and managing an online database in the field of transaction processing to store e-commerce transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; software as a service (SAAS) services that provide an electronic financial platform for conducting e-commerce in an integrated mobile phone and web based environment; software as a service (SAAS) services for designing, personalizing, and targeting the content of electronically delivered advertising and marketing content; software as a service (SAAS) services to enable the transmission of advertising and marketing campaigns to consumers via consumer electronic devices including mobile phones, portable media viewers, desktop computers, laptop computers, electronic entertainment devices, handheld computers, tablet computers, and video game systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring advertiser and marketer tools for collecting, analyzing, forecasting, predicting, reporting and sharing data and information about consumer advertising and consumer preferences, behavior and lifestyles; providing consumer-defined content and content of others selected and customized based on known demographic information for the consumer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |