USPTO serial 85402861
MOTRICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTRICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing carrier services, namely, internet access provider services; providing applications, widgets, and the delivery of downloadable goods via mobile phone, wireless networks, and web-based environments, namely, transmission of digital files, sound, video and information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; design and development of mobile applications, websites, mobile websites, microsites, and client interfaces; design, development of rich media smartphone, feature phone, handheld computer, and tablet mobile applications; computer software design and development services in the field of mobile and wireless applications; hosting digital content on the Internet; hosting online websites and webpages for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites for delivery of localized, customized and personalized content to handheld computers, mobile electronic devices, electronic entertainment devices, desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, and video game systems; computer services, namely, hosting for others of websites and databases for tracking, monitoring, managing, collecting, analyzing, optimizing and reporting data regarding consumer preferences, behavior and lifestyles; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the design and development of mobile applications, websites, mobile websites, microsites, user interfaces, and web-based advertisements; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for allowing companies to connect to consumers to deliver advertising and marketing content over global computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for merchandising, marketing, interactive marketing, advertising, and content aggregation via a mobile phone, wireless networks, and web based environments; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images, and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for selling and delivering digital music, videos, and other forms of rich media content; providing software as a service (SAAS) services featuring on-line non-downloadable software tools for managing digital content; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for customer relationship management; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in monetizing online content delivery services and performing electronic business transactions via a global computer network; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, editing, and managing an online database in the field of transaction processing to store e-commerce transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides an electronic financial platform for conducting e-commerce in an integrated mobile phone and web based environment; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing, personalizing, and targeting the content of electronically delivered advertising and marketing content; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to enable the transmission of advertising and marketing campaigns to consumers via consumer electronic devices including mobile phones, portable media viewers, desktop computers, laptop computers, electronic entertainment devices, handheld computers, tablet computers, and video game systems; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring advertiser and marketer software tools for collecting, analyzing, forecasting, predicting, reporting, and sharing data and information about consumer advertising and consumer preferences, behavior, and lifestyles; providing consumer-defined and generated content and content of others selected and customized based on known demographic information for Internet, mobile telephone, and/or other wired or wireless digital network-based consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |