Drawing for SALVATION

USPTO serial 85403553

SALVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 31, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 15, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 3, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 11, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance