USPTO serial 85403710
SUPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Whitham
MICHAEL E. WHITHAM WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electrical, signaling, checking and teaching apparatus; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating and controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of data, current, sound and images; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; remote control apparatus; wireless receivers; interfaces for computers; apparatus for wireless transmitting of energy, current and data; transmitter interfaces; wireless apparatus; apparatus for communication; computer programs (recorded and downloadable software), in particular, programs for wireless transmission of energy, data and current; apparatus and devices for inductive coupling of apparatuses; chargers for electric batteries, all in Class 9 Furniture, mirrors; office furniture; desks (furniture); tables; school furniture, all in Class 20 Telecommunication, communication of networks, in particular, wireless communication; electronic transmitting of data inclusive of image and sound; providing access to databases, all in Class 38 Rental of charging stations for charging of accumulators; distribution of electricity, energy and data transmission and transport of electrical energy; supply of consumers by delivering of electrical energy, all in Class 39 Design and development of computer hardware and software, in particular for wireless transmission of energy, data and current; communication technical consultancy; computer software design; technical consultancy; all aforementioned services, in particular in the field of wireless transmission of energy, data and current, in particular for mobile terminal devices, all in Class 42 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |