USPTO serial 85403877
JELLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JELLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORRAINE PINSENT
LORRAINE PINSENT BENNETT JONES LLP4500, 855 2ND STREET S.W.CALGARY, ALBERTA, T2P4K7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetic coded gift cards | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 016 | paper gift cards | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | coffee cups | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo shirts, caps, hats, jackets, shorts and aprons | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 030 | doughnuts; coffee beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | franchise consulting, namely, advice in the funning of establishments as franchises | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 040 | bakery services, namely, the manufacture of bakery products to order and/or specification of others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | providing business training in the field of management for franchise operations, supervising franchises and management of vendor services incidental to the operation of a franchised business | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 043 | restaurant, café services and take-out restaurant services; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JELLY MODERN DOUGHNUTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named JELLY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |