Drawing for BLAZE CRAZE

USPTO serial 85403904

BLAZE CRAZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLAZE CRAZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward F. Perlman

EDWARD F PERLMAN WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toy vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 9, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 31, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 31, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 6, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance