Drawing for EVOEN

USPTO serial 85403985

EVOEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVOEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad E. Harrigan

BRAD E. HARRIGAN LUGENBUHL WHEATON PECK RANKIN & HUBBARD601 POYDRAS ST STE 2775NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-6041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for planning and monitoring vessel voyages to assure compliance with applicable navigational regulations; computer hardware and software used for interfacing navigation and engineering data and communications; computer hardware and software used for commercial regulatory compliance for vessels; computer software for use in geographic applications, namely, for use in processing digitally encoded data while inter-operating with electronic navigational instruments; computer hardware and software to be used with satellite and GPS navigation systems for navigation purposes; downloadable computer software accessed via wireless devices for purposes of assisting with navigation and regulatory compliance; electronic hardware and software for navigation purposes, namely, computers and personal digital assistants used for presentation or creation of maps and other geographic informationACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software accessed via wireless devices for purposes of assisting with vessel navigation and regulatory complianceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 29, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 27, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance