USPTO serial 85404791
AIRBLUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4310786Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2013
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRBLUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Heiss
DJF ENTERPRISES767 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2014 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |