USPTO serial 85404918
ENGINEERED BUBBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGINEERED BUBBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. BARBER
WILLIAM J. BARBER WARE, FRESSOLA, MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 MAIN ST., PO BOX 224BRADFORD GREEN, BLDG 5MONROE, CT 06468-0224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Non-chemical admixture in the nature of polymers for use in flotation separation processes, namely, small, lightweight low density polymer beads and particles with a surface area size characteristic; chemically activated polymer shells, sponges or semi-porous particles with a predetermined size, and polymers designed for binding to other particles, linear oligomer and low molecular weight polymers, and chemically encapsulated polymer blocks, all of the foregoing for use in processing a mixture comprising a mineral particle of interest in flotation tanks or cells or in flotation separators, including for adding to the mixture in the flotation cell or tank in order to separate the mineral particle of interest from the mixture and to carry or lift the mineral particle of interest in the mixture to the surface of the flotation cell or tank, by attracting, or binding to, or wrapping around substrate in the mixture in the flotation cell or tank, and/or in order to provide a slow targeted or time-activated release at a potentially desired location where the release is required of the one or more chemicals in the mixture of the flotation cell or tank, such as frothers; or non-chemical air entrained admixture in the nature of polymers and glass for use in making concrete mixtures, namely, small hollow polymer and glass beads, particles and cylinders for use in processing mixtures, namely, for use in making concrete mixtures in order to control the amount of entrained air contained therein | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |