Drawing for VEK

USPTO serial 85405493

VEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jesus Sanchelima, Esq.

JESUS SANCHELIMA SANCHELIMA ASSOCIATES PA235 S LE JEUNE RDMIAMI, FL 33134 1762UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for remotely controlling computer peripheralsABANDONED—
042Developing software and hardware for third parties in the fields of automation systems, image analysis, artificial intelligence/adaptive learning, and roboticsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 7, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 7, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 5, 2012OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance