USPTO serial 85405953
ABC KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABC KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Curtin
Thomas H. Curtin Powley & Gibson, P.C.304 Hudson StreetSuite 202New York, NY 10013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cooking and salad oils; fruit spreads; jellies; jams; marmalades; olive oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | sauces; condiments, namely, hot sauce, oyster sauce, seafood sauce, cocktail sauce, kimchee, nuoc cham, mustard, ketchup, vinegar, mayonnaise, salad dressing, chutney, aioli, spices, dry rubs, salts, capers, teriyaki, wasabi, tomato paste, tomato sauce, pesto, tapenade, marinade, hoisin sauce, black bean sauce, ginger dipping sauce, ponzu sauce, masala, salsa, vinaigrette, chocolate sauce, tzatziki, bbq sauce, horseradish, bean paste, curry sauce, fish sauce, umeboshi paste, plum sauce, tamari, mint sauce, and mole, and specifically excluding soy sauce and chili sauce; relishes; seasonings; baked goods, namely, brownies, bars, cakes, breads, pizza crusts, granola, granola bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring cooking and salad oils, fruit spreads, jellies, jams, marmalades, olive oil, sauces, condiments, namely, hot sauce, oyster sauce, seafood sauce, cocktail sauce, kimchee, nuoc cham, mustard, ketchup, vinegar, mayonnaise, salad dressing, chutney, aioli, spices, dry rubs, salts, capers, teriyaki, wasabi, tomato paste, tomato sauce, pesto, tapenade, marinade, hoisin sauce, black bean sauce, ginger dipping sauce, ponzu sauce, masala, salsa, vinaigrette, chocolate sauce, tztaziki, bbq sauce, horseradish, bean paste, curry sauce, fish sauce, umeboshi paste, plum sauce, tamari, mint sauce, mole, relishes, seasonings, baked goods, namely, brownies, bars, cakes, breads, pizza crusts, granola, granola bars, and wine and specifically excluding soy sauce and chili sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ABC Home Furnishings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ABC Home Furnishings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ABC KITCHEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |